SAN vs NAS Storage

Published: May 4, 2023
By: Warren Nicholson

SAN vs NAS Storage

When it comes to data storage, the options can seem overwhelming. Two popular choices are NAS and SAN storage solutions. Both offer unique benefits and cater to different needs. But which one is right for you? Here, we will break down NAS vs SAN storage and their respective advantages to help you decide which solution best fits your requirements.

What Is a NAS Storage System?

NAS (Network Attached Storage) storage is a data storage solution that connects to a network, allowing multiple users and devices to access the stored data. NAS systems contain one or more hard drives in an enclosure connected to a local area network (LAN). These systems can be set up with different levels of redundancy, such as RAID configurations, ensuring data protection and availability. 

NAS storage offers several advantages over traditional file servers. One of the most significant benefits is its ease of use. With intuitive web interfaces, users can easily manage their NAS devices. 

Another benefit is scalability; businesses can expand their storage capacity by adding additional drives or upgrading existing ones without disrupting their operations. Additionally, since it has shared access over LANs or WANs, it is ideal for small businesses with multiple employees who need to share files frequently. 

A NAS system provides centralized file-sharing functionality on a network while offering scalability options for future growth in your business requirements. 

How NAS and SAN Work 

NAS (Network Attached Storage) and SAN (Storage Area Network) are two types of storage technologies that have become increasingly popular in the digital age. These technologies offer efficient and secure ways to store, access, and manage data. However, they have distinct differences in terms of their architecture, functionality, and use cases. 
 
NAS is a file-level storage system that operates on a local area network (LAN). It consists of one or more drives connected to a network through an Ethernet connection. The NAS device acts as a central location for storing files that can be accessed by multiple users simultaneously over the network. These devices are typically used for small businesses or homes where there is a need for shared access to data among multiple users. 
 
On the other hand, SAN is a block-level storage system that operates on a high-speed fiber channel or Ethernet connection. It is designed specifically for large enterprises with heavy workloads and critical applications that require high-performance storage solutions. A SAN comprises multiple servers connected to shared storage resources such as hard drives or tape drives. 
 
The main difference between NAS vs SAN lies in how they handle data transfer. In NAS systems, data is transferred through standard protocols like NFS (Network File System) or CIFS/SMB (Common Internet File System/Server Message Block), which make it easy for different operating systems to communicate with one another over the network. This means that any user with appropriate permissions can access files stored on the NAS device using their preferred operating system. 
 
In contrast, SAN uses block level transfers via SCSI commands over high-speed connections such as fiber channels or iSCSI (Internet Small Computer System Interface). This enables fast data transfers between servers and shared storage devices without involving the LAN infrastructure. 
 
Another key difference between NAS vs SAN is their scalability. NAS systems are more suitable for smaller environments where there is limited room for expansion. They have limitations on the number of users who can concurrently access the data and the maximum storage capacity they can handle. On the other hand, SAN offers better scalability as it allows for the addition of more storage resources and servers to meet the growing needs of a business. 

What Is a SAN Storage System?

SAN storage stands for Storage Area Network and is a network of storage devices connected to multiple servers. It is different from NAS in the sense that SAN operates at a lower level, allowing all servers on the network to access the same block-level data. 

One of the primary benefits of SAN is its scalability. As businesses grow and require more storage space, they can add new disks or entire arrays without disrupting existing operations. Additionally, SANs provide redundancy features such as mirroring or replication that help ensure business continuity in case of hardware failures. 

Another advantage of SAN vs NAS is it allows IT administrators fine-grained control over which servers can access specific parts of the storage system. 

While SAN may be more complex than NAS and require specialized expertise for installation and maintenance, it provides organizations with scalable, high-performance storage solutions suitable for mission-critical workloads. 

The Benefits of Nfina’s NAS Storage Solutions

Nfina NAS storage is a data storage solution for small businesses that need a central location to store and share files. With NAS, you can easily access your data anywhere in the world using an internet connection. 

• Simple to operate
• Lower cost and scalability; NAS systems cost less than SANs. Start with a basic setup and expand as your needs grow so you do not have to invest money upfront for a complete hardware setup
• Easy data backup and recovery, with granular security features such as automated disaster recovery testing
• Centralization of data storage in a safe, reliable way for authorized network users and clients
• Supports a large variety of applications
• Permits data access across the network, including cloud-based applications and data 
• Includes iSCIS or Fibre channel data accessibility
• NAS storage security enhancement, including unlimited snapshots and clones of data with one-click failover when using our Nfina-View™ software
• On-site and off-site data protection
• Copy-on-write
• Snapshot encryption while data is at rest and in transit
• Supports block, file, and unified storage

If you’re looking for an affordable yet highly functional way to store and share files within your network, then NAS storage might be the perfect solution. 

The Benefits of Nfina’s SAN Storage Solutions

Nfina SAN storage is a data storage solution for any size business that requires fault-tolerant, redundant storage.

• Improve application availability via multiple data paths
• High performance and reliability
• Includes iSCIS or Fibre channel data accessibility 
• Supports block, file, and unified storage 
• Easy to scale – add new disk arrays to the network without disrupting operations
• Enhance application performance (e.g., off-load storage functions, segregate or zone networks, etc.) 
• Increase storage utilization and effectiveness (e.g., consolidate storage resources, provide tiered storage, etc.)
• Nfina-View™ software provides data protection and security with unlimited snapshots and clones, including a rollback function for data restoration
• Snapshot encryption while data is at rest and in transit
• N-way mirrors; single, dual, and triple parity RAID
• Fault-tolerant: redundancy like disk mirroring and dual controllers ensure your data remains safe if a hardware failure occurs

If your business needs fast performance, and the ability to scale up rapidly, while maintaining high levels of reliability and security, then SAN storage may be the right choice for you. 

SAN vs NAS, Which Data Storage Solution is Right for You?

When deciding between SAN vs NAS storage, it is important to consider your specific needs. If you are a small business owner who needs to store files and access them easily, then NAS may be the way to go. It is relatively easy to maintain and does not require specialized IT knowledge. 

On the other hand, if you are running a larger organization with more complex storage requirements, then SAN may be the better option. With its high-performance capabilities and ability to support multiple servers simultaneously, it can handle heavy workloads.

Another consideration when choosing between these two options is cost. While NAS tends to be more affordable upfront, over time it can become more expensive as your storage needs grow. SAN systems are typically more expensive upfront but can save money in the long run due to their scalability.

When evaluating SAN vs NAS storage solutions, consider your company’s size, budgetary constraints, speed requirements, and security considerations. However, one thing remains certain: investing in either solution will help streamline workflows while keeping valuable information secure at all times.

Types of SAN Protocols 

In this section, we will discuss the different types of SAN protocols that are commonly used in enterprise environments. 
 
1. Fibre Channel (FC): FC is a high-speed networking technology designed specifically for SANs. It operates at the physical layer of the OSI model and uses fiber optic cables to transport data between servers and storage devices. FC has been a dominant protocol in SAN environments due to its reliability, low latency, and ability to handle large amounts of data. 
 
2. Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI): iSCSI is an IP-based storage protocol that enables block-level access over Ethernet networks. It allows organizations to leverage their existing network infrastructure for storage connectivity, making it a cost-effective solution compared to FC. However, iSCSI may not be ideal for high-performance applications as it can be affected by network congestion. 
 
3. Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE): FCoE combines the best features of FC and Ethernet by encapsulating FC frames into Ethernet packets, allowing them to travel over an Ethernet network. This eliminates the need for separate cabling infrastructures for storage and networking, reducing costs and simplifying management. 
 
4. Internet Fiber Channel Protocol (iFCP): Similar to FCoE, iFCP also enables FC traffic to run over an IP-based network but differs in its approach. Instead of encapsulating FC frames into Ethernet packets like FCoE, iFCP converts them into IP packets before sending them across the network. 
 
5. Serial Attached SCSI (SAS): SAS is a point-to-point serial interface used primarily for connecting server hosts or disk drives in DAS or SAN environments. It offers improved scalability compared to traditional parallel SCSI interfaces but is still limited in terms of distance and connectivity options. 
 
6. InfiniBand: InfiniBand is a high-speed data transfer protocol that provides extremely low latency and high bandwidth for SAN environments. It uses a switched fabric architecture, making it highly scalable and suitable for large-scale deployments. 
 
Choosing the right SAN protocol largely depends on the requirements of your organization, including performance needs, budget constraints, and existing infrastructure. Each protocol has its advantages and limitations, so it’s essential to carefully evaluate your storage environment before deciding. 

When to Use SAN or NAS? 

The answer lies in your specific business needs and requirements. If your organization has multiple users who need simultaneous access to shared files over a LAN, then NAS would be the more suitable option. It also works well for storing large amounts of unstructured data such as documents, images, videos, etc. 
 
However, if your organization requires high-performance computing with low latency times or needs advanced disaster recovery capabilities then SAN would be the better choice. It is also a great option for virtualized environments where multiple servers need to access shared storage resources. 
 
Both NAS and SAN have their strengths and should be chosen based on the specific needs of your organization. It’s essential to carefully assess your business requirements and consider factors such as budget, scalability, performance, and data management before making a decision. Ultimately, choosing between NAS or SAN storage can significantly impact your organization’s productivity and efficiency, so it’s crucial to make an informed decision that aligns with your long-term goals. 

SAN vs NAS: A Helpful Guide

When it comes to network-based storage, NAS vs SAN, network-attached storage (NAS) and storage-area networks (SAN) are two popular choices that complement each other. The reality is that they are completely different products that serve different purposes, and often coexist together in the same environment. Which one you choose will largely depend on your organization’s needs. Let’s look at some of the differences between NAS and SAN products.

SAN vs NAS?

The idea that a company is faced with a choice between a SAN vs NAS is not an accurate scenario. SAN vs NASs are different tools for different jobs, just as a saw and a screwdriver are different tools for different jobs.  A SAN is a primary storage device.  It is the proper tool when critical data must be readily available – take a bank for example.   The transactions that are taking place at the teller window must be recorded and immediately available for verification.  If a customer makes a deposit and then writes a check against that deposit, the data showing the funds are in the account must be available.  A SAN must also be secure.  Ideally a SAN will have no single point of failure. To minimize exposure to loss of data, do not assume that every SAN has no single point of failure, because Not all SANs on the market are free of single points of failure. Check with your vendor to be sure, and do not be afraid to ask specific questions.  Backplane and I/O are frequent single points of failure found on SANs from some manufacturers.

Simplicity vs Speed

One of the main differences between SAN vs NAS is simplicity.

A NAS is designed to be plugged directly into your existing network or LAN (or a separate VLAN or domain if it’s used for disaster recovery). Because its networking is based on TCP/IP, a NAS integrates into your network as any other device would, making it readily accessible to the other computers, tablets and devices accessing the LAN.  A NAS can be thought of as a massive thumb drive.

In contrast, the SAN utilizes iSCSI, Infiniband, or Fibre Channel to create its own network that is accessed by a virtualized server or servers in a virtual computing environment, rather than individual clients. The advantage of this approach is raw speed, since the SAN’s network is segregated from the rest of the LAN and uses its own protocol.

Another factor affecting simplicity is the way each system deals with data. Because NAS traces its roots back to Microsoft file sharing, as well as Novell’s NetWare, NAS automatically supports a number of modern networking protocols and file systems. What’s more, most NAS setups also include administrative software to help manage file serving, automatic backups and other functions a NAS is commonly used for. A SAN, on the other hand, addresses data by blocks, rather than filenames or types, and is designed to offer a common pool of storage to a server or servers. While this certainly provides more raw potential, it also requires more knowledge and expertise to set up and manage.

When it comes to simplicity, a NAS system offers clear advantages, while a SAN wins for raw speed. This is an important difference between NAS and SAN.

Expansion

Both NAS and SAN devices are easily expandable with JBODs.

With a NAS setup, each NAS is a self-contained entity. It’s often possible to expand the storage of a NAS, taking its capacity from terabytes to petabytes. Depending on the operating system, networking devices can be pooled, and the NAS devices can grow into a farm or cluster if required.

A SAN can similarly be expanded with JBODs, but each SAN server (since it’s comprised of two servers working in synchronized lock-step) must be expanded identically.  Since a SAN is duplicating data from primary to secondary, synching the SAN can be an issue as well.  A 24-48TB SAN can synch up with its partner in days.  A PB SAN could take weeks or months depending on the load.  While SANs are in synch mode, the critical data is exposed, and disaster recover from the synching device is non-existent.

In either case, the volume cannot increase without a re-formatting of the drives.  It is better to just add “new” volumes with the JBODs

SAN vs NAS cost

Because of its much simpler design, NAS appliances are often far less expensive than SANs, in terms of hardware and management.

At Nfina, our Eco-Friendly Solutions make it easy for our customers to achieve a lower carbon footprint and play a positive role in bringing about a sustainable future. We design technologies and products to help people understand their impact and actions better.

Nfina’s Hybrid Cloud and Hyperconverged solutions provide energy efficiency by using high-density, lower-power VMs enabling our customers to scale their digital transformations sustainably by optimizing space, reducing power consumption, and lowering cooling and maintenance costs. Nfina is taking a leadership role in doing what it takes to tackle climate change.

Nfina has been carbon neutral for our operations since opening in 2012.